Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keith Wallace (rapper)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:48, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Keith Wallace (rapper) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable rapper, received only minor local coverage which is mostly an interview. The claim of tens of millions of views is also directly contradicted by the single independent source. There is no meaningful coverage of Wallace and once I removed the massive BLP vio, we're left with two sentences that don't support his being notable. CUPIDICAE💕 14:28, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Searching yields low quality and irrelevant results. Fails wp:basic. ~ Aselestecharge-paritytime 14:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per all above. Oaktree b (talk) 14:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete There are no reliable sources to make this rapper qualify for GNG and BASIC. Grailcombs (talk) 17:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - no touring, only a local rapper, lack of significant coverage, and thus fails WP:MUSICBIO. Bearian (talk) 18:13, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Per a BEFORE, very few RS that contribute toward WP:MUSICBIO or GNG. --Kbabej (talk) 22:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.